Imre Barany, Rade Zivaljevic, Helge Tverberg, and Sinisa Vrecica
Recall the beautiful theorem of Tverberg: (We devoted two posts (I, II) to its background and proof.)
Tverberg Theorem (1965): Let be points in
,
. Then there is a partition
of
such that
.
The (much easier) case of Tverberg’s theorem is Radon’s theorem.
1. Eckhoff’s Partition Conjecture
Eckhoff raised the possibility of finding a purely combinatorial proof of Tverberg’s theorem based on Radon’s theorem. He considered replacing the operation : “taking the convex hull of a set ” by an arbitrary closure operation.
Let be a set endowed with an abstract closure operation
. The only requirements of the closure operation are:
(1)
and
(2)
implies
.
Define to be the largest size of a (multi)set in
which cannot be partitioned into
parts whose closures have a point in common.
Eckhoff’s Partition Conjecture: For every closure operation
If is the set of subsets of
and
is the convex hull operation then Radon’s theorem asserts that
and Eckhoff’s partition conjecture would imply Tverberg’s theorem. Update (December 2010): Eckhoff’s partition conjecture was refuted by Boris Bukh. Here is the paper.
2. The dimension of Tverberg’s points
For a set , denote by
those points in
which belong to the convex hull of
pairwise disjoint subsets of
. We call these points Tverberg points of order
.
Conjecture (Kalai, 1974): For every
,
.
Note that .
This conjecture includes Tverberg’s theorem as a special case: if ,
, and
, then the sum in question is at most
.
Akiva Kadari proved this conjecture (around 1980, unpublished) for planar configurations.

Akiva Kadari and Ziva Deutsch (both are my academic brothers).
3. The number of Tverberg’s partitions
Sierksma Conjecture: The number of Tverberg’s
-partitions of a set of
points in
is at least
.
Gerard Sierksma
4. The Topological Tverberg Conjecture
Let
be a continuous function from the
-dimensional simplex
to
. If
then there are
pairwise disjoint faces of
whose images have a point in common.
If is a linear function this conjecture reduces to Tverberg’s theorem.
The case was proved by Bajmoczy and Barany using the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. In this case you can replace the simplex by any other polytope of the same dimension. (This can be asked also for the general case.)
The case where is a prime number was proved in a seminal paper of Barany, Shlosman and Szucs. The prime power case was proved by Ozaydin (unpublished), Volovikov, and Sarkaria. For the prime power case, the proofs are quite difficult and are based on computations of certain characteristic classes.
5. Reay’s Relaxed Tverberg Condition
Moriah Sigron (right) and other participants in a lecture by Endre Szemeredi. (See further comment below.)
Let be the smallest integer such that given
points
in
,
there exists a partition
of
such that every
among the convex hulls
,
have a point in common.
Reay’s “relaxed Tverberg conjecture“ asserts that that whenever
,
.
Micha A. Perles and Moriah Sigron have rather strong results in this direction, but at the same time Perles strongly believes that Reay’s conjecture is false, and he often mentions this special case:
Given 1,000,000 points in , Tverberg’s theorem asserts that you can partition them into 1,000 parts whose convex hulls have a point in common. Now given 999,999 points in
is it always possible to divide them to 1,000 parts such that the convex hulls of every two of them will have a point in common? It is hard to believe that the answer is negative.
6. Colorful Tverberg theorems
Zivaljevic and Vrecica’s colorful Tverberg’s theorem asserts the following: Let be disjoint subsets of
, called colors, each of cardinality at least
. A
-subset
of
is said to be multicolored if
for
. Let
be an integer, and let
denote the smallest value
such that for every collection of colors
of size at least
there exist
disjoint multicolored sets
such that
. Zivaljevic and Vrecica proved that
for all
, and
if
is a prime.
This theorem is one of the highlights of discrete geometry and topological combinatorics. The only known proofs for this theorem rely on topological arguments.
The colorful Tverberg conjecture asserts that
.
Update: This conjecture was proved by Blagojecic Matschke and Ziegler
Let me mention another direction of moving from “colorful results” to analogous “matroidal results.” A set whose elements are colored with colors gives rise to a matroid where the rank of a set is the number of colors of elements in the set. So it is natural to consider an arbitrary matroid structure on the ground set and replace “multicolor set” by “a basis in the matroid”. For example, Barany’s colorful Caratheodory theorem was extended by Meshulam and me to a matroidal theorem. (With Barany and Meshulam we have some preliminary results on matroidal Tverberg theorems.)
7. The computational complexity of Tverberg’s theorem
Problem: Is there a polynomial-time algorithm to find a Tverberg partition when Tverberg’s theorem applies?
A positive answer will follow from a positive answer to:
Problem: Is there a polynomial algorithm for Barany’s colorful Caratheodory theorem?
The picture above (taken by Ofer Arbeli during a lecture by Endre Szemeredi at Hebrew University’s Institute for Advanced Study) shows how encouraging young babies (and even younger) to attend lectures, is instrumental in bringing Israeli mathematics and computer science to its leadership stature.


There’s also the Tverberg version of halfspace depth, due to Rouseeuw and Hubert. As far as I remember it, it was: given (d+1)n points in R^d, there exists a hyperplane H, and a partition of the points into n subsets such that H cannot be moved to a vertical position without passing through at least one of the points of each subsets.
My co-authors and I had some partial results on this in arXiv:cs.CG/9809037 (DCG 2000) (showing that a partition into n subsets of this type is possible for sets of cn points for some c that is larger than d+1 but smaller than previously known) but as far as I know the full problem is still open.
Thanks David. Let me mention again also the Tverberg-Vrecica conjecture offering a far reaching common extension of Tverberg’s theorem and Ham-sandwitches theorems.
Regarding Conjecture 2, I wonder if configurations where the sum equals zero has some special role. Perhaps the following is true: Start with any configurtion A such that
, then there is a small perturbation A’ so that
and
for every
.
Maybe we can even choose A’ to have the property tht for every partition of the set A, the dimension of intersection of the convex hull of the parts does not increase when we move from A to A’.
There is a problem which I have heard referred to as a Radon relative in which you are given 8 points the problem is to partition them into three sets which form two triangles and a line segment such that the line segment intersects both triangles. As I recall at the time I saw it I thought I could solve it. I don’t know its history or if it is still open or if there is a class of related problems or who originated it.
Kristal, indeed it sounds like a Radon type problem. (There are many, and good references are two survey articles by J Eckhoff.) Where are the 8 points in the plane? in space?
I think one survey article by Eckhoff is in the handbook of convex geometry: Helly, Radon, and Caratheodory type theorems. Where is the other one? The points are in the plane.
Dear Kristal, here is the other: Eckhoff, Jürgen Radon’s theorem revisited. Contributions to geometry (Proc. Geom. Sympos., Siegen, 1978), pp. 164–185, Birkhäuser, Basel-Boston, Mass., 1979.
Two conjectures in the list have now been solved. The colorful Tverberg conjecture (for prime numbers of parts) conjecture was proved by Pavle Blagojecic, Benjamin Matschke, and Guenter Ziegler using topological methods. A counterexample to Eckhoff’s partition conjecture was found by Boris Bukh.
Let me mention that the following weaker form of the conjecture in question 2 is also open and interesting: For every
,
.