<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lovasz&#8217;s Two Families Theorem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2008/12/25/lovaszs-two-families-theorem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2008/12/25/lovaszs-two-families-theorem/</link>
	<description>Gil Kalai's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gil Kalai</title>
		<link>http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2008/12/25/lovaszs-two-families-theorem/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Kalai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Dear Bruno,
you are absolutely right. thanks you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Bruno,<br />
you are absolutely right. thanks you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruno</title>
		<link>http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2008/12/25/lovaszs-two-families-theorem/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Thank you for entertaining us with good math ! Still, I&#039;m puzzled by your (re-)formulation of the quaternion version of the k=l=2  two-families subspace problem. Why aren&#039;t p_i also *lines* (seven of them) instead of *points* in three-dimensional quaternionic projective space ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for entertaining us with good math ! Still, I&#8217;m puzzled by your (re-)formulation of the quaternion version of the k=l=2  two-families subspace problem. Why aren&#8217;t p_i also *lines* (seven of them) instead of *points* in three-dimensional quaternionic projective space ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elad</title>
		<link>http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2008/12/25/lovaszs-two-families-theorem/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>elad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 13:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/?p=856#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Any relation to Sergey Yekhanin&#039;s construction of 3-query locally decodable codes? A part of his constructions looks somewhat similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any relation to Sergey Yekhanin&#8217;s construction of 3-query locally decodable codes? A part of his constructions looks somewhat similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
