‘Gina Says’

‘Gina Says': Adventures in the Blogosphere String War

I wrote a book: “‘Gina Says': Adventures in the Blogosphere String War.”

It is a sort of a popular science book and it is also about blogging and debating.

You can download the first part of the book : It is a 94 page pdf file.

Download the second part of the book : It is a 123 page pdf file

For the original post describing the book click here. Praise for the book: click here.

Preface

In the summer of 2006 two books attacking string theory, a prominent theory in physics, appeared. One by Peter Woit called Not even wrong” and the other by Lee Smolin called “The trouble with Physics.” A fierce public debate, much of it on weblogs, ensued.

Gina is very curious about science blogs.  Can they be useful for learning about, or discussing science? What happens in these blogs and who participates in them? Gina is eager to learn the issues and to form her own opinion about the string theory controversy. She is equipped with some academic background, even in mathematics, and has some familiarity with academic life. Her knowledge of physics is derived mainly from popular accounts. Gina likes to debate and to argue and to be carried by her associations. She is fascinated by questions about rationality and philosophy, and was exposed to various other scientific controversies in the past.

This book uses the blog string theory debate to tell about blogs, science, and mathematics. Meandering over various topics from children’s dyscalculia to Chomskian linguistics, the reader may get some sense of the chaotic and often confused scientific experience.  The book tries to show the immense difficulty involved in getting the factual matters right and interpreting fragmented and partial information.

Some little chapters appeared also as posts:

Drachmas,

Optimism,

Thomas Bayes and probability,

Can category theory serve as the foundation of mathematics,

Controversies ,

Debates,

Foundational impossibilities,

Amazing possibilities, (links and comments),

Noise,

Ulam and the future of mathematics,

Some philosophy of science.

Anat Lotan: ho is Gina I

Anat Lotan: Who is Gina II

5 Responses to ‘Gina Says’

  1. Pingback: Anat Lotan: Who is Gina I « Combinatorics and more

  2. Pingback: Benoît’s Fractals « Combinatorics and more

  3. Nice thanks for the links to the book.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Hello Gil,

    I read Gina says a while ago, and the following experience brought it to my mind again.
    I ran across a Math professor named Norman Wildberger while searching for lectures on projective geometry. He has many youtube videos on Math, it’s foundations, it’s history and some videos that seem to promote a personal agenda or view that is not mainstream:

    http://m.youtube.com/user/njwildberger

    My own math background is that of undergraduate studies, but I judge his videos ( I saw several of his Math history series ) to be very enlightening and accurate. He certainly seems to know what he is talking about.
    The issue is that he inserts some provocative messages from time to time, ranting about flaws in the foundations of math. He also runs a blog:

    http://njwildberger.wordpress.com

    My questions are:
    Have you heard of him?
    How serious are his claims?
    How frequent is “crack pottery” in Math where things should be more clear cut than other sciences?
    How “dangerous” do you think it is for outrageous ( and possibly false) claims to get such a stage? ( coming from credentialed scientists which gain popular attention)

    Thank you,
    Anonymous

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s