Seven Problems Around Tverberg’s Theorem


Imre Barany, Rade Zivaljevic, Helge Tverberg, and Sinisa Vrecica 

Recall the beautiful theorem of Tverberg: (We devoted two posts (I, II) to its background and proof.)

Tverberg Theorem (1965): Let x_1,x_2,\dots, x_m be points in R^d, m \ge (r-1)(d+1)+1. Then there is a partition S_1,S_2,\dots, S_r of \{1,2,\dots,m\} such that \cap _{j=1}^rconv (x_i: i \in S_j) \ne \emptyset.

The (much easier) case r=2 of Tverberg’s theorem is Radon’s theorem.


1. Eckhoff’s Partition Conjecture

Eckhoff raised the possibility of finding a purely combinatorial proof of Tverberg’s theorem based on Radon’s theorem. He considered replacing the operation : “taking the convex hull of a set A” by an arbitrary closure operation.

Let X  be a set endowed with an abstract closure operation X \to cl(X). The only requirements of the closure operation are:

(1) cl(cl (X))=cl(X) and

(2) A \subset B implies cl(A) \subset cl (B).

Define t_r(X) to be the largest size of a (multi)set in X which cannot be partitioned into r parts whose closures have a point in common.

Eckhoff’s Partition Conjecture: For every closure operation t_r \le t_2 \cdot (r-1).

If X is the set of subsets of R^d and cl(A) is the convex hull operation then Radon’s theorem asserts that t_2(X)=d+1 and Eckhoff’s partition conjecture would imply Tverberg’s theorem. Update (December 2010): Eckhoff’s partition conjecture was refuted by Boris Bukh. Here is the paper.  

2. The dimension of Tverberg’s points

For a set A, denote by T_r(A) those points in R^d which belong to the convex hull of r pairwise disjoint subsets of X. We call these points Tverberg points of order r.

Conjecture (Kalai, 1974): For every A \subset R^d , \sum_{r=1}^{|A|} {\rm dim} T_r(A) \ge 0.

Note that \dim \emptyset = -1.

This conjecture includes Tverberg’s theorem as a special case: if |A|=(r-1)(d+1)+1, dim A =d, and T_r (A)=\emptyset, then the sum in question is at most (r-1)d + (|A|-r+1)(-1) = -1.                            

Akiva Kadari proved this conjecture (around 1980, unpublished) for planar configurations.

Akiva Kadari and Ziva Deutsch (both are my academic brothers).


3. The number of Tverberg’s partitions

Sierksma Conjecture: The number of Tverberg’s r-partitions of a set of (r-1)(d+1)+1 points in R^d is at least ((r-1)!)^d.


Gerard Sierksma


4. The Topological Tverberg Conjecture

Let f be a continuous function from the m-dimensional simplex \sigma^m to R ^d. If m \ge (d+1)(r-1) then there are r pairwise disjoint faces of \sigma^m whose images have a point in common.

If f is a linear function this conjecture reduces to Tverberg’s theorem.

The case r=2 was proved by Bajmoczy and Barany using the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. In this case you can replace the simplex by any other polytope of the same dimension. (This can be asked also for the general case.)

The case where  r is a prime number was proved in a seminal paper of Barany, Shlosman and  Szucs.  The prime power case was proved by Ozaydin (unpublished), Volovikov, and Sarkaria. For the prime power case,  the proofs are quite difficult and are based on computations of certain characteristic classes.


5. Reay’s Relaxed Tverberg Condition



Moriah Sigron (right)  and other participants in a lecture by Endre Szemeredi. (See further comment below.)

Let t(d,r,k) be the smallest integer such that given m points  x_1,x_2,\dots, x_m in R^d, m \ge t(d,r,k) there exists a partition S_1,S_2,\dots, S_r of \{1,2,\dots,m\} such that every k among the convex hulls conv (x_i: i \in S_j), j=1,2,\dots,r  have a point in common.

Reay’srelaxed Tverberg conjecture” asserts that that whenever k >1, t(d,r,k)= (d+1)(r-1)+1.

Micha A. Perles and Moriah Sigron have rather strong results in this direction, but at the same time Perles strongly believes that Reay’s conjecture is false, and he often mentions this special case:

Given 1,000,000 points in R^{1000}, Tverberg’s theorem asserts that you can partition them into 1,000 parts whose convex hulls have a point in common. Now given 999,999 points in R^{1000} is it always possible to divide them to 1,000 parts such that the convex hulls of every two of them will have a point in common?  It is hard to believe that the answer is negative.


6. Colorful Tverberg theorems

Zivaljevic and Vrecica’s colorful Tverberg’s theorem asserts the following:  Let C_1,\cdots,C_{d+1} be disjoint subsets of R^d, called colors, each of cardinality at least t. A (d+1)-subset S of \bigcup^{d+1}_{i=1}C_i is said to be multicolored if S\cap C_i\not=\emptyset for i=1,\cdots,d+1. Let r be an integer, and let T(r,d) denote the smallest value t such that for every collection of colors C_1,\cdots,C_{d+1} of size at least t there exist r disjoint multicolored sets S_1,\cdots,S_r such that \bigcap^r_{i=1}{\rm conv}\,(S_i)\not=\emptyset. Zivaljevic and Vrecica  proved that T(r,d)\leq 4r-1 for all r, and T(r,d)\leq 2r-1 if r is a prime.

This theorem is one of the highlights of discrete geometry and topological combinatorics. The only known proofs for this theorem rely on topological arguments.

The colorful Tverberg conjecture asserts that T(r,d)= r.

Update: This conjecture was proved by  Blagojecic Matschke and Ziegler

Let me mention another direction of moving from “colorful results” to analogous “matroidal results.”  A set whose elements are colored with r colors gives rise to a matroid where the rank of a set is the number of colors of elements in the set. So it is natural to consider an arbitrary matroid structure on the ground set and replace “multicolor set” by “a basis in the matroid”. For example, Barany’s colorful Caratheodory theorem was extended by Meshulam and me to a matroidal theorem. (With Barany and Meshulam we have some preliminary results on matroidal Tverberg theorems.)


7. The computational complexity of Tverberg’s theorem

Problem: Is there a polynomial-time  algorithm to find a Tverberg partition when Tverberg’s theorem applies?

A positive answer will follow from a positive answer to:

Problem: Is there a polynomial algorithm for Barany’s colorful Caratheodory theorem? 


The picture above (taken by Ofer Arbeli during a lecture by Endre Szemeredi at Hebrew University’s Institute for Advanced Study)  shows how encouraging young babies (and even younger) to attend lectures, is instrumental in bringing Israeli mathematics and computer science to its leadership stature.   

About these ads

12 thoughts on “Seven Problems Around Tverberg’s Theorem

  1. D. Eppstein

    There’s also the Tverberg version of halfspace depth, due to Rouseeuw and Hubert. As far as I remember it, it was: given (d+1)n points in R^d, there exists a hyperplane H, and a partition of the points into n subsets such that H cannot be moved to a vertical position without passing through at least one of the points of each subsets.

    My co-authors and I had some partial results on this in arXiv:cs.CG/9809037 (DCG 2000) (showing that a partition into n subsets of this type is possible for sets of cn points for some c that is larger than d+1 but smaller than previously known) but as far as I know the full problem is still open.

  2. Gil Kalai

    Regarding Conjecture 2, I wonder if configurations where the sum equals zero has some special role. Perhaps the following is true: Start with any configurtion A such that \sum T_r(A) >0, then there is a small perturbation A’ so that \sum T_r(A')=0 and T_r(A') \le T_r(A) for every r.

    Maybe we can even choose A’ to have the property tht for every partition of the set A, the dimension of intersection of the convex hull of the parts does not increase when we move from A to A’.

  3. Kristal Cantwell

    There is a problem which I have heard referred to as a Radon relative in which you are given 8 points the problem is to partition them into three sets which form two triangles and a line segment such that the line segment intersects both triangles. As I recall at the time I saw it I thought I could solve it. I don’t know its history or if it is still open or if there is a class of related problems or who originated it.

  4. Gil

    Kristal, indeed it sounds like a Radon type problem. (There are many, and good references are two survey articles by J Eckhoff.) Where are the 8 points in the plane? in space?

  5. Kristal Cantwell

    I think one survey article by Eckhoff is in the handbook of convex geometry: Helly, Radon, and Caratheodory type theorems. Where is the other one? The points are in the plane.

  6. Gil

    Dear Kristal, here is the other: Eckhoff, Jürgen Radon’s theorem revisited. Contributions to geometry (Proc. Geom. Sympos., Siegen, 1978), pp. 164–185, Birkhäuser, Basel-Boston, Mass., 1979.

  7. Gil Kalai Post author

    Two conjectures in the list have now been solved. The colorful Tverberg conjecture (for prime numbers of parts) conjecture was proved by Pavle Blagojecic, Benjamin Matschke, and Guenter Ziegler using topological methods. A counterexample to Eckhoff’s partition conjecture was found by Boris Bukh.

  8. Pingback: Some old and new problems in combinatorics and geometry | Combinatorics and more

  9. Pingback: My Mathematical Dialogue with Jürgen Eckhoff | Combinatorics and more

  10. Pingback: From Oberwolfach: The Topological Tverberg Conjecture is False | Combinatorics and more

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s