Satoshi Murai and Eran Nevo have just proved the 1971 generalized lower bound conjecture of McMullen and Walkup, in their paper On the generalized lower bound conjecture for polytopes and spheres . Let me tell you a little about it. For more background see the post: How the g-conjecture came about.
Face numbers and h-numbers
Let P be a (d-1)-dimensional simplicial polytope and let be the number of -dimensional faces of P. The –vector (face vector) of P is the vector .
Face numbers of simplicial d-polytopes are nicely expressed via certain linear combinations called the h-numbers. Those are defined by the relation:
What’s called “Stanley’s trick” is a convenient way to practically compute one from the other, as illustrated in the difference table below, taken from Ziegler’s book `Lectures on Polytopes’, p.251:
1 5 12
1 4 7 8
h= (1 3 3 1)
Here, we start with the -vector of the Octahedron (1,6,12,8) (bold face entries) and take differences as shown in this picture to end with the -vector (1,3,3,1).
The Euler-Poincare relation asserts that . More is true. The Dehn-Sommerville relations state that is symmetric, i.e. for every .
The generalized lower bound conjecture
In 1971, McMullen and Walkup posed the following conjecture, which is called the generalized lower bound conjecture (GLBC):
Let P be a simplicial d-polytope. Then
(A) the h-vector of P, satisfies .
(B) If for some then can be triangulated without introducing simplices of dimension .
The first part of the conjecture was solved by Stanley in 1980 using the Hard Lefschetz theorem for toric varieties. This was part of the g-theorem that we discussed extensively in a series of posts (I, I’, II, III, B). In their paper, Murai and Nevo give a proof of part (B). This is remarkable!
Earlier posts on the g-conjecture:
I: (Eran Nevo) The g-conjecture I
I’ How the g-conjecture came about
II (Eran Nevo) The g-conjecture II: The commutative-algebra connection
III (Eran Nevo) The g-conjecture III: Algebraic shifting