Recent Comments

Recent Posts
 First third of my ICM2018 paper – Three Puzzles on Mathematics, Computation and Games. Corrections and comments welcome
 Preview: The solution by Keller and Lifshitz to several open problems in extremal combinatorics
 Basic Notions Seminar is Back! Helly Type Theorems and the Cascade Conjecture
 My Very First Book “Gina Says”, Now Published by “World Scientific”
 Itai Benjamini: Coarse Uniformization and Percolation & A Paper by Itai and me in Honor of Lucio Russo
 AfterDinner Speech for Alex Lubotzky
 Boaz Barak: The different forms of quantum computing skepticism
 Bálint Virág: Random matrices for Russ
 Test Your Intuition 33: The Great Free Will Poll
Top Posts & Pages
 First third of my ICM2018 paper  Three Puzzles on Mathematics, Computation and Games. Corrections and comments welcome
 Answer: Lord Kelvin, The Age of the Earth, and the Age of the Sun
 Elchanan Mossel's Amazing Dice Paradox (your answers to TYI 30)
 Preview: The solution by Keller and Lifshitz to several open problems in extremal combinatorics
 Can Category Theory Serve as the Foundation of Mathematics?
 A Breakthrough by Maryna Viazovska Leading to the Long Awaited Solutions for the Densest Packing Problem in Dimensions 8 and 24
 Eran Nevo: gconjecture part 4, Generalizations and Special Cases
 TYI 30: Expected number of Dice throws
 Believing that the Earth is Round When it Matters
RSS
Tag Archives: Quantum computers
A Few Slides and a Few Comments From My MIT Lecture on Quantum Computers
I gathered a few of the comments made by participants of my lecture “Why quantum computers cannot work and how”, and a few of my answers. Here they are along with some of the lecture’s slides. Here is the link … Continue reading
Meeting with Aram Harrow, and my Lecture on Why Quantum Computers Cannot Work.
Last Friday, I gave a lecture at the quantum information seminar at MIT entitled “Why quantum computers cannot work and how.” It was a nice event with lovely participation during the talk, and a continued discussion after it. Many very … Continue reading
Symplectic Geometry, Quantization, and Quantum Noise
Over the last two meetings of our HU quantum computation seminar we heard two talks about symplectic geometry and its relations to quantum mechanics and quantum noise. Yael Karshon: Manifolds, symplectic manifolds, Newtonian mechanics, quantization, and the non squeezing theorem. … Continue reading
The Quantum Debate is Over! (and other Updates)
Quid est noster computationis mundus? Nine months after is started, (much longer than expected,) and after eight posts on GLL, (much more than planned,) and almost a thousand comments of overall good quality, from quite a few participants, my … Continue reading
The Quantum FaultTolerance Debate Updates
In a couple of days, we will resume the debate between Aram Harrow and me regarding the possibility of universal quantum computers and quantum fault tolerance. The debate takes place over GLL (Godel’s Lost Letter and P=NP) blog. The Debate Where were … Continue reading
A Discussion and a Debate
Heavier than air flight of the 21 century? The very first post on this blog entitled “Combinatorics, Mathematics, Academics, Polemics, …” asked the question “Are mathematical debates possible?” We also had posts devoted to debates and to controversies. A few days ago, … Continue reading
Aaronson and Arkhipov’s Result on Hierarchy Collapse
Scott Aaronson gave a thoughtprovoking lecture in our Theory seminar three weeks ago. (Actually, this was eleven months ago.) The slides are here . The lecture discussed two results regarding the computational power of quantum computers. One result from this paper gives an … Continue reading
When Noise Accumulates
I wrote a short paper entitled “when noise accumulates” that contains the main conceptual points (described rather formally) of my work regarding noisy quantum computers. Here is the paper. (Update: Here is a new version, Dec 2010.) The new exciting innovation in computer … Continue reading
Detrimental Noise
“Imagine there’s no heaven, it’s easy(?) if you try,” John Lennon Disclaimer: It is a reasonable belief (look here, and here), and an extremely reasonable working assumption (look here) that computationally superior quantum computers can be built. (This post and the draft … Continue reading