A High-Dimensional Diameter Problem for Polytopes

Avi Wigderson is here for a year and it was a good opportunity to go back together to the question of diameter of polytopes. The diameter problem for polytopes is to determine the behavior of the maximum diameter f(d,n) of the graph G(P) of a simple d-polytopes P with n facets. We gave this problem considerable attention over here. (For example, we devoted to it polymath3.)

Let me mention an interesting problem about a high dimensional generalization of the “polynomial Hirsh conjecture”.

Let P be a simple d-polytope with n facets (or, more generally, the dual of a simplicial (d-1)-sphere with n vertices).

Is the following true:

Every polygon Z in the graph of P with k edges is the boundary of a 2-chain C with \ell_1 norm (sum of coefficients) at most a polynomial number f(k,d,n) in k, d, and n?

One can be more ambitious and ask for a a representation of Z as the boundary of a polyhedral 2-ball B. (In this case the \ell_1 norm is simply the number of 2-faces of B.)

But I am not sure even about this question:

Does every induced polygon in a graph of a simple polytope P the boundary of some 2-ball B (in the 2-skeleton of P)?

Is it known?

Remarks: a) Of course we can consider the question for cycles of dimensions greater than 2. We want to understand the behavior of the function f_m(k,d,n) such that for every simple d-polytope P with n facets we can represent every m-dimensional cycle Z with \|C\|_1=k, as the boundary of a (m+1)-dimensional chain C,  such that

\|C\|_1 \le f_m(k,d,n).

b) One can ask also for an analog for the revisiting path question. And c) restriction attention to (duals) of vertex-decomposable spheres also is reasonable. This question is related to systolic inequalities and to high-dimensional expanders. As always, comments are welcome (also regarding polymath3.)

This entry was posted in Combinatorics, Convex polytopes, Convexity, Polymath3 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to A High-Dimensional Diameter Problem for Polytopes

  1. Hi Gil,

    You cannot hope in general for an embedded 2-disk. This is easy in dimension 4 (because of knots) but also false in higher dimension (you can essentially take suspensions of 4-dim examplex and look at the doubles of knots.)

  2. Also, it would seem to me that the method of your paper gives at least a subexponential bound for the first question. and it seems to be at least as hard as Hirsch.

Leave a comment