### Recent Comments

domotorp on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Thanks for Additivit… on The Kadison-Singer Conjecture… domotorp on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… domotorp on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Gil Kalai on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… Philip Gibbs on Polymath10, Post 2: Homologica… -
### Recent Posts

- Polymath10, Post 2: Homological Approach
- Polymath10: The Erdos Rado Delta System Conjecture
- Convex Polytopes: Seperation, Expansion, Chordality, and Approximations of Smooth Bodies
- Igor Pak’s collection of combinatorics videos
- EDP Reflections and Celebrations
- Séminaire N. Bourbaki – Designs Exist (after Peter Keevash) – the paper
- Important formulas in Combinatorics
- Updates and plans III.
- NogaFest, NogaFormulas, and Amazing Cash Prizes

### Top Posts & Pages

- The Kadison-Singer Conjecture has beed Proved by Adam Marcus, Dan Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava
- Polymath10, Post 2: Homological Approach
- Polymath10: The Erdos Rado Delta System Conjecture
- New Ramanujan Graphs!
- The Mystery Piano-Player at the Mittag-Leffler Institute
- 'Gina Says'
- Extremal Combinatorics III: Some Basic Theorems
- Answer: Lord Kelvin, The Age of the Earth, and the Age of the Sun
- Why is Mathematics Possible: Tim Gowers's Take on the Matter

### RSS

# Tag Archives: Borsuk’s conjecture

## Around Borsuk’s Conjecture 3: How to Save Borsuk’s conjecture

Borsuk asked in 1933 if every bounded set K of diameter 1 in can be covered by d+1 sets of smaller diameter. A positive answer was referred to as the “Borsuk Conjecture,” and it was disproved by Jeff Kahn and me in 1993. … Continue reading

## Andriy Bondarenko Showed that Borsuk’s Conjecture is False for Dimensions Greater Than 65!

The news in brief Andriy V. Bondarenko proved in his remarkable paper The Borsuk Conjecture for two-distance sets that the Borsuk’s conjecture is false for all dimensions greater than 65. This is a substantial improvement of the earlier record (all dimensions … Continue reading

## A Weak Form of Borsuk Conjecture

Problem: Let P be a polytope in with n facets. Is it always true that P can be covered by n sets of smaller diameter? I also asked this question over mathoverflow, with some background and motivation.

## Around Borsuk’s Conjecture 1: Some Problems

Greetings to all! Karol Borsuk conjectured in 1933 that every bounded set in can be covered by sets of smaller diameter. In a previous post I described the counterexample found by Jeff Kahn and me. I will devote a few posts … Continue reading

## The Combinatorics of Cocycles and Borsuk’s Problem.

Cocycles Definition: A -cocycle is a collection of -subsets such that every -set contains an even number of sets in the collection. Alternative definition: Start with a collection of -sets and consider all -sets that contain an odd number of members … Continue reading

## Raigorodskii’s Theorem: Follow Up on Subsets of the Sphere without a Pair of Orthogonal Vectors

Andrei Raigorodskii (This post follows an email by Aicke Hinrichs.) In a previous post we discussed the following problem: Problem: Let be a measurable subset of the -dimensional sphere . Suppose that does not contain two orthogonal vectors. How large … Continue reading

## A Little Story Regarding Borsuk’s Conjecture

Jeff Kahn Jeff and I worked on the problem for several years. Once he visited me with his family for two weeks. Before the visit I emailed him and asked: What should we work on in your visit? Jeff asnwered: … Continue reading

## Borsuk’s Conjecture

Karol Borsuk conjectured in 1933 that every bounded set in can be covered by sets of smaller diameter. Jeff Kahn and I found a counterexample in 1993. It is based on the Frankl-Wilson theorem. Let be the set of vectors of length . … Continue reading