Recent Comments

Recent Posts
 My Very First Book “Gina Says”, Now Published by “World Scientific”
 Itai Benjamini: Coarse Uniformization and Percolation & A Paper by Itai and me in Honor of Lucio Russo
 AfterDinner Speech for Alex Lubotzky
 Boaz Barak: The different forms of quantum computing skepticism
 Bálint Virág: Random matrices for Russ
 Test Your Intuition 33: The Great Free Will Poll
 Mustread book by Avi Wigderson
 High Dimensional Combinatorics at the IIAS – Program Starts this Week; My course on Hellytype theorems; A workshop in Sde Boker
 Stan Wagon, TYI 23: Ladies and Gentlemen: The Answer
Top Posts & Pages
 My Very First Book "Gina Says", Now Published by "World Scientific"
 About
 Elchanan Mossel's Amazing Dice Paradox (your answers to TYI 30)
 TYI 30: Expected number of Dice throws
 Why Quantum Computers Cannot Work: The Movie!
 The Race to Quantum Technologies and Quantum Computers (Useful Links)
 Answer: Lord Kelvin, The Age of the Earth, and the Age of the Sun
 Amazing: Peter Keevash Constructed General Steiner Systems and Designs
 If Quantum Computers are not Possible Why are Classical Computers Possible?
RSS
Tag Archives: Borsuk’s conjecture
Around Borsuk’s Conjecture 3: How to Save Borsuk’s conjecture
Borsuk asked in 1933 if every bounded set K of diameter 1 in can be covered by d+1 sets of smaller diameter. A positive answer was referred to as the “Borsuk Conjecture,” and it was disproved by Jeff Kahn and me in 1993. … Continue reading
Andriy Bondarenko Showed that Borsuk’s Conjecture is False for Dimensions Greater Than 65!
The news in brief Andriy V. Bondarenko proved in his remarkable paper The Borsuk Conjecture for twodistance sets that the Borsuk’s conjecture is false for all dimensions greater than 65. This is a substantial improvement of the earlier record (all dimensions … Continue reading
A Weak Form of Borsuk Conjecture
Problem: Let P be a polytope in with n facets. Is it always true that P can be covered by n sets of smaller diameter? I also asked this question over mathoverflow, with some background and motivation.
Around Borsuk’s Conjecture 1: Some Problems
Greetings to all! Karol Borsuk conjectured in 1933 that every bounded set in can be covered by sets of smaller diameter. In a previous post I described the counterexample found by Jeff Kahn and me. I will devote a few posts … Continue reading
The Combinatorics of Cocycles and Borsuk’s Problem.
Cocycles Definition: A cocycle is a collection of subsets such that every set contains an even number of sets in the collection. Alternative definition: Start with a collection of sets and consider all sets that contain an odd number of members … Continue reading
Raigorodskii’s Theorem: Follow Up on Subsets of the Sphere without a Pair of Orthogonal Vectors
Andrei Raigorodskii (This post follows an email by Aicke Hinrichs.) In a previous post we discussed the following problem: Problem: Let be a measurable subset of the dimensional sphere . Suppose that does not contain two orthogonal vectors. How large … Continue reading
A Little Story Regarding Borsuk’s Conjecture
Jeff Kahn Jeff and I worked on the problem for several years. Once he visited me with his family for two weeks. Before the visit I emailed him and asked: What should we work on in your visit? Jeff asnwered: … Continue reading
Borsuk’s Conjecture
Karol Borsuk conjectured in 1933 that every bounded set in can be covered by sets of smaller diameter. Jeff Kahn and I found a counterexample in 1993. It is based on the FranklWilson theorem. Let be the set of vectors of length . … Continue reading