What is the density of a subset of
that guarantees that
contains a 3-term arithmetic progression? And, more generally, if the density of
is
what is the minimum number of 3-terms AP that
contains?
These problems and the more general problems for -term AP, are very exciting and mathematicians worked on them extensively in the last century. (We devoted several posts to earlier breakthroughs.)
This morning. a striking new paper by Zander Kelley and Raghu Meka appeared on the arXiv describing an absolutely amazing breakthrough. (I am thankful to Ryan Alweiss for telling me about it.) Here is the link to the paper
Strong Bounds for 3-Progressions, by Zander Kelley and Raghu Meka
Abstract: We show that for some constant β>0, any subset A of integers {1,…,N} of size at least
contains a non-trivial three-term arithmetic progression. Previously, three-term arithmetic progressions were known to exist only for sets of size at least for a constant
.
Our approach is first to develop new analytic techniques for addressing some related questions in the finite-field setting and then to apply some analogous variants of these same techniques, suitably adapted for the more complicated setting of integers.
Huge congratulations to Zander Kelley and Raghu Meka, and to the mathematical community.
AI generated image showing arithmetic progression by shutterstock.
An earlier 2020 post on 3-term AP and related problems with much bacground on the problem: To cheer you up in difficult times 7: Bloom and Sisask just broke the logarithm barrier for Roth’s theorem!;
I apologize for misspelling the authors’ names in the early version.
Updates: A few words about the proof; The proof is based on Fourier methods. The argument applies first for the case of and then transfer the argument (with some difficulties and complications) to
. An account of the Kelley–Meka proof, with some modifications of the second part is given by Bloom and Sisask at https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07211.
There is now another account of the Kelley–Meka proof, from Thomas F. Bloom and Olof Sisask at https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07211