Blogging was slow recently, and I have various half written posts on all sort of interesting things, and plenty of unfulfilled promises. I want to quickly share with you two and a half news items regarding combinatorial designs. As you may remember Peter Keevash proved the century old conjecture on the existence of designs. We talked about it in this post, and again in this post. I wrote a Bourbaki exposition about this development and related results and problems. I gained some (rather incomplete) understanding of the proof by listening to Peter’s lectures, looking at the papers, talking to people, preparing to my lecture about it, writing the presentation, and incorporating remarks of people who read earlier versions and pointed out that I miss some important ingredient.

## The existence of designs – second proof!

A new proof for Keevash’s theorem on the existence of designs was discovered by Stefan Glock, Daniela Kühn, Allan Lo, and Deryk Osthus! The proof is given in the paper The existence of designs via iterative absorption, and the paper contains also some new applications of the method of proof. This is great news! A second proof to a major difficult theorem is always very very important and exciting. Keevash’s theorem gave a vast generalization of the problem for decompositions of hypergraphs to complete subhypergraphs and the new theorem is even a much more general hypergraph decomposition theorem. Congratulations!

## New q-analogs of designs

One of the important open problems about designs is the existence of q-analogs. The first example was given in 1987 by Simon Thomas. Michael Braun, Tuvi Etzion , Patric R. J. Östergard , Alexander Vardy, Alferd Wasserman found remarkable new q-designs. See also this article: Researchers found mathematical structure that was thought not to exist. Congratulations! It is an interesting question if the new existence methods apply to q-analogs (and perhaps in greater generality for all sort of algebraic gadgets).

## Some more things

As part of a project with Nati Linial and Yuval Peled I was interested in finding a* k*-dimensional simplicial complex on *k(k-1)* vertices with a complete *(k-1)*-dimensional skeleton, with vanishing rational homology so that every *(k-1)* face is included in the same number of *k*-faces. (This “same number” must be *k*.) Better still I want all links of i-faces to be combinatorially the same. For *k*=2 the 6-vertex triangulation of is an example, but I did not have any other example. I asked about it on MathOverflow and GNiklasch identified a remarkable example for *k=3*. (And there are some hopes for *k=4*.) Actually, I need to devote a post to MathOverflow experiences. I got answers there to several problems that intrigued me for decades.

One more thing: Daniela Kühn and Deryk Osthus were involved in recent years (sometimes with coauthors) in knocking out some very important problems in graph theory and extremal combinatorics. Their ICM14 survey describes some of their works related to Hamiltonian cycles including their solution to the famous Kelly’s conjecture.

The Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (54 (2017), 107-116) has an article related to the work of Peter Keevash by Tim Gowers available at the link below:

Click to access S0273-0979-2016-01553-9.pdf

Thanks, Joe, I remember I saw Tim’s preprint at some time, then wanted to add a link and couldnt find it. So your comment is a little miracle.

Pingback: Peter Keevash: More and Easier Designs! | Combinatorics and more

Here is a videotaped lecture by Daniela Kühn

Pingback: Ringel Conjecture, Solved! Congratulations to Richard Montgomery, Alexey Pokrovskiy, and Benny Sudakov | Combinatorics and more